Sunday, December 28, 2008

The Photo Still Exists

Readers and bloggers confirm that the hospital picture by Khalil Hamra was removed from the Washington Post photo album. The photo of "Palestinian children and a man wounded in Israeli missile strikes are seen in the emergency area at Shifa hospital in Gaza City" can still be viewed here. Hatip: The Augean Stables.

Visit the Washington Post's website and search for the photographer Khalil Hamra. The picture shows up with this URL. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/photo/2008/12/27/PH2008122700591.html Note the "Washington Post" in the address.

Sphere: Related Content

Update on the Gaza Propaganda War -- 6 PM EST

The Washington Post's website changed its photo essay and no longer shows Khalil Hamra's fake hospital shots. It even added a picture of damage done to an Israeli apartment by a Hamas Kassam rocket.

Meanwhile, the New York Times'
slide show only shows the Palestinian side of the conflict. One caption goes so far as to describe "dozens of mutilated [Palestinian] bodies," thus suggesting another atrocity committed by Israel.

Note in the New York Times' photos how many of the dead or wounded are in uniform, but the Times' captions fail to make the point that they were combatants: "Palestinians gathered around bodies [in uniform]" or "Palestinians carried an injured man [wearing camouflage trousers]."

Sphere: Related Content

Saturday, December 27, 2008

Israel Attacks Hamas --
Here Comes the Hamas Propaganda Attack

As late as Friday, many Israeli citizens were pulling out their hair. Hamas rockets were falling like rain on Israeli civilians. What was Israel waiting for? Why was Israel allowing the delivery of supplies into Gaza? Why were Israeli hospitals treating Palestinians hurt by errant Hamas rockets?

Now we have some answers:

  • The humanitarian assistance also served to lull Hamas into believing that Israel was going soft.

  • The attack on the Jewish Sabbath was also unexpected by Hamas.

  • Israeli intelligence was tracking, following, and marking the Hamas leadership, terrorist camps, and rocket crews for months. Hundreds of Hamas soldiers were caught in their bases. It can be assumed that aerial surveillance was able to retrace the steps of rocket crews to observe the locations of rocket warehouses and factories. As a result the Israeli Air Force attacks were remarkably accurate.

Now the Propaganda Counterattack

The blood libels against Israel have already begun. A British defense writer, Sean Rayment, blasted Israel in a Telegraph (UK) blog today, "The attack on the Gaza strip is proof that Israel is addicted to violence. Slaughtering 155 civilians, many of whom are women and children, can not be justified."

An absolute blood libel. No military force in the world is as careful as the Israeli Defense Forces in differentiating combatants from the civilians surrounding them. Note this report from Bloomberg: "Most of the Palestinian dead were members of the Hamas security forces, including police chief Tawfiq Jaber and the head of the organization’s Security and Protection Service, Ismail al-Jabary, said Taher Noono, a spokesman for Hamas. "

Pictures from Gaza indicate this fact. Note these photos of Palestinian security forces hit in their bases. These are uniformed combatants of a force that declared war on Israel, and they are very legitimate targets according to international law.

But now comes the "fauxtography" so prominent in the Lebanon war.

A Washington Post photo essay posted the two pictures above of the Palestinian combatants along with a picture of Palestinian wounded in a Gaza hospital. The picture was accompanied by this caption: Palestinian children and a man wounded in Israeli missile strikes are seen in the emergency area at Shifa hospital in Gaza City, Saturday, Dec. 27, 2008. Israeli warplanes demolished dozens of Hamas security compounds across Gaza on Saturday in unprecedented waves of simultaneous air strikes. Gaza medics said at least 145 people were killed and more than 310 wounded in the single deadliest day in Gaza fighting in recent memory. (AP Photo/Khalil Hamra) (Khalil Hamra - AP)

The children appear healthy. Would the photographer and caption writer, Khalil Hamra, fake a picture?

Yes.

Khalil Hamra is the credited AP photographer for many of the pictures of the International Solidarity Movement activities in Gaza, including those of Rachel Corrie. To recall, Rachel Corrie was an American activist who attempted to stop an Israeli bulldozer from destroying Gazan tunnels in 2003. Corrie slipped under the bulldozer, was killed and became a shaheed of the left. Hamra's pictures include this one of Corrie burning an American flag (left).


A search of Google images shows hundreds of Hamra's pictures of grieving Palestinians as well as Palestinian dead and wounded. His many pictures of Hamas and Islamic Jihad fighters and military exercises suggest that Hamra could almost serve as Hamas' official photographer.

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, December 21, 2008

Guest Response from Journalist and Author Gideon Remez

Right on. Your questions about the MiG 29s are very apt and timely -- Isabella and I were startled last night by this development too. I think, however, that the Russian contingent that arrives in Lebanon with the planes will not be limited to the "advisors and instructors" that you correctly listed. Since given the Lebanese air force's current shape it will take years to recruit and train the necessary complement of pilots, if the planes arrive before then they can only be flown by Russians if not Syrians/Iranians.

In this respect the effect of the MiG-29s in Lebanon will resemble what is to be expected when the Russians complete the upgrading of their facility at Tartus to a full-fledged naval base, protected by Soviet-manned SAM systems, and their aircraft carrier Admiral Kuznetzov (with MiG-29s as well as Su-27s) either is based there or visits as necessary. The IAF will, at the very least, be seriously constrained in repeating an operation like the attack on the suspected Syrian reactor, and it certainly will no longer be able to overfly Lebanon, much less attack targets there, with impunity.

Regarding question 12 -- according to one of the reports we saw (in the London Times), the head of Russia's defense cooperation agency mentioned potential supply of "heavy armor" to Lebanon too.

Finally, the putative Lebanese deal combines with the increasing indications that the Russians have no intention of keeping their word to Olmert about refraining from S-300 sales to Iran and Syria; according to a breaking news headline that just now came onto Fox news, Moscow has officially announced the sale to Iran.

This pattern underscores the futility of attempts to buy off the Russians with such gestures as handing over the Sergei Courtyard [in Jerusalem], exempting Russian tourists from visas, or -- worst of all -- selling them Israeli UAV's out of trust in their end-user commitments.

It is a grave underestimation of the Russians to believe that their concept of national interests and priorities can be changed by such offerings, or that (as we were told by a senior intelligence analyst!) "Putin has a soft spot for Israel."

Isabella Ginor and Gideon Remez are the authors of Foxbats over Dimona, The Soviets' Nuclear Gamble in the Six-Day War

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, December 18, 2008

20 Questions about Lebanon’s New MiG-29s

Lebanon’s Defense Minister Elias Murr announced this week in Moscow that Russia offered to give Lebanon 10 refurbished MiG-29 fighter jets. The planes will certainly not tip the Arab-Israeli arms balance, but there are many questions surrounding the arms transfer:

1. Does the Russian “sale” indicate a shift away from Lebanon’s long-standing policy of acquiring American weapons? Russian aircraft come with Russian advisors, instructors, radars, weapons and combat doctrine.
2. Will the Lebanese government approve of Defense Minister Murr’s deal and the concomitant change of orientation? The deal requires government approval.
3. Will MiG-29s in Lebanon be interoperable with Syria’s 65 MiG-29s and Iran’s 25 MiG-29s?
4. Will Lebanon’s MiG-29 aircraft and support facilities serve as forward bases for Iran and Syria? Tours conducted by this author of Georgian airbases several years ago indicated that the Soviet Union planned to use Georgian bases as forward refueling, maintenance and re-arming stations against the West. The bases were chockablock with Soviet missiles, ammunition and bombs.
5. What happens after Lebanon’s May 2009 elections when Hizbullah may become an even more prominent player in Lebanon’s government?
6. Will Hizbullah be integrated into Lebanon’s army which is already estimated to be one-third Shiite? In the 1980s the army’s Sixth Brigade – predominately Shiite and trained by Americans – realigned itself with Lebanese militias. The Brigade rightfully earned its reputation, “We serve and defect.”
7. Will Hizbullah have access to the aircraft?
8. Will Hizbullah pilots be trained in Iran or Syria to be on standby for taking over the planes?
9. Against whom does Lebanese Army need MiG-29s, a plane comparable to the American-made F-15?
10. Will the Lebanese Army ever take on the potent Hizbullah army, trained and equipped by Iran? Today, there are vast Hizbullah areas in Lebanon’s south and Bekaa Valley where the Lebanese Army and UNIFIL forces dare not to tread.
11. Will the Lebanese army share the Russian equipment, such as the radars, with Hizbullah? That was the case when Hizbullah attacked and almost sank an Israeli ship during the 2006 war. The ship was tracked by Lebanese army radar stations, later destroyed by Israel.
12. One of the biggest threats to Lebanon today is the growth of al-Qaeda in the Palestinian refugee camps in Lebanon. The fighting last year in Nahr el Bared against Fatah al-Islam took more than 100 days and cost the Lebanese Army dozens of casualties. The Lebanese army needs heavy tanks, armored vehicles and combat helicopters for that kind of intense urban fighting, not fighter jets. What good are MiG29s in this fight?
13. Will the Lebanese Air Force use the MiG-29s to challenge Israeli overflights of Lebanon? Israeli aircraft are constantly tracking Hizbullah’s build-up and missile acquisition which Hizbullah does with impunity in violation of UN resolutions 1501 and 1701.
14. How will the Israeli Air Force respond to Lebanese jets flying south of the Litani River and approaching Israeli airspace?
15. What is Russia getting out of the deal? Clearly Russia is challenging American hegemony in the Middle East. The deal “is an effort to reassert Russia's status in the Middle East in a way that has very high visibility," said analyst Anthony Cordesman of the Washington-based Center for Strategic and International Studies.
16. Is the MiG-29 deal a Russian response to American and Israeli military support for Mikhail Saakashvili’s Georgia?
17. How will the U.S. react to the deal? Is the MiG-29 transfer a shuk tactic to get the United States to increase its support for the Lebanese army? Last year the U.S. military assistance to Lebanon amounted to $400 million.
18. Will the U.S. respond by selling advanced fixed-wing aircraft to Lebanon? Currently, Lebanon has two 1960-vintage Hawker Hunter jets.
19. What level of Western technology in Lebanese hands will undermine Israel’s military edge?
20. In May 2008 Hizbullah occupied Beirut, and the Lebanese Army vanished. The action took place after the Lebanese government attempted to replace a Hizbullah-affiliated chief of security at the Beirut airport and tried to shut down Hizbullah’s independent fiber-optic communications network. Can security really be provided for any advanced military equipment in Lebanon?

Sphere: Related Content

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

New Iranian Danger: Is Iran Setting Up Bases around the World?

Anyone who has played the strategic board game Risk can envision the world's choke points and key strategic crossroads. Today, upon analysis of Iranian activities and ties, it's not difficult to imagine Iran's green armies setting up bases around the world. The goals: to challenge American military forces across the globe and to position forces which can threaten Western shipping and commercial interests.

Iran's involvement in the terror and turmoil of Iraq has been well documented. Iran also threatens the petroleum lifeline through the Persian (Arabian) Gulf. Forty percent of the world's petroleum sails past Iran's batteries of anti-ship missiles and through the Straits of Hormuz -- the jagged choke point on the northeast corner of the Arabian Peninsula. Armed Iranian fast boats have repeatedly challenged U.S. Navy ships in the area. A pipeline under construction through the United Arab Emirates to the south should eventually cut the dependence on the Straits.

But a new report now places Iranian troops and missiles near the Horn of Africa at another choke point, the Bab el-Mandeb, on the Arabian Peninsula's southern tip. According to The Cutting Edge, "Iranian ships and submarines have deployed an undisclosed number of Iranian troops and weapons at the Eritrean port town of Assab, according to opposition groups, foreign diplomats, and NGOs in the area."

MEMRI reports, "Eritrean opposition websites reported that Eritrea has granted Iran total control of the Red Sea port of Assab, which overlooks the Bab el-Mandeb straits."

All ships going through the Suez Canal sail through the Red Sea and pass through the Bab el-Mandeb, including oil tankers and military vessels. Shipping to Israel's Eilat port and to Jordan's Aqaba port goes through the straits. Israel's Ashkelon-Eilat pipeline -- pumping Azeri oil eastward to the far east or westward from the Persian Gulf to Europe -- relies on oil tankers that sail past Assab.

From the Eastern Med to West Africa and South America

Iran's potent proxy, Hizbullah, has firmly established itself politically and militarily in Lebanon. Israel's Defense Forces must take into account Syrian and Hizbullah (actually Iranian-led) forces to its north. Hizbullah's tens of thousands of rockets and anti-shipping missiles have transformed large segments of Lebanon into Iranian military bases on the eastern shores of the Mediterranean. For many years Lebanon's Bekaa Valley was the center for poppy cultivation and a massive international drug operation. Today, the Lebanese government has no authority in the Bekaa, and Hizbullah bases there are used by Iranian Revolutionary Guards to train terrorists from all over the world.

Iran and Hizbullah are pushing hard into western Africa. "West African countries have a large Arab community, and many of them are Shi'ite immigrants from Lebanon - who constitute the Hizbullah infrastructure in the region," a senior official at the Israeli Foreign Ministry told The Jerusalem Post this summer.

Matthew Levitt, the director of The Washington Institute's Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence, has investigated the Hizbullah money trail. He reported, "A 2003 charter flight from Cotonou, Benin, in West Africa to Beirut, crashed on takeoff, killing all the passengers. On board were senior Hizbullah members, carrying $2 million in contributions to the organization from across the region. Arab press reports said the money represented the 'regular contributions the party receives from wealthy Lebanese nationals in Guinea, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Benin and other African states.' A senior Hizbullah official was immediately dispatched to Benin to console the 'sons of the Lebanese community.'”
Competing Saudi, Pakistani and Iranian activists are all trying to win the souls and minds of Nigeria. In 2005 Iranian defense officials toured Nigerian bases and pledged military cooperation. Hizbullah training bases have also sprouted in Nigeria. (See picture from one Nigerian camp. Trainees are holding pictures of Hizbullah's Nasrallah and Hamas' Sheikh Yassin.)

In recent months the Nigerian-Iranian cooperation has also focused on the petroleum and nuclear energy fields. Iran and Nigeria, both major oil producers, have been hit hard by the precipitous drop of the price of oil. The two countries plan to join with Hugo Chavez' Venezuela to push OPEC to cut oil production in order to push oil prices skyward.

In August 2008, Iran offered Nigeria assistance in developing nuclear technology to increase its generation of electricity.

In east Africa, Iranian cooperation with Sudan serves to put pressure on Egypt, Sudan's neighbor to its north, as well as provides additional threats to Red Sea shipping. Leaders of the two pariah states have met often, with Iran providing weapons to Sudan despite a United Nations ban on weapons sales.

The Caribbean Threat

Iran's cooperation with Venezuela's Chavez goes far beyond the two countries' shared petroleum problems. Chavez, a very frequent visitor to Tehran, has helped Iran develop relations with Bolivia, Nicaragua and Ecuador.

Hizbullah activity in Venezuela guarantees Iran a Latin American ally. Officials from the Center for Security Policy testified earlier this year before the House Foreign Affairs Committee, "Since 2003, there have been reports on the presence of Islamic terrorist groups in [Venezuela's] Margarita Island. The U.S. Southern Command stated that Isla Margarita is one of the most important centers of terrorist gathering and money laundering activities for Hamas and Hizbullah. The Chavez regime is giving out Venezuelan passports to foreigners from countries such as Iran, Syria, Pakistan, Egypt and Lebanon."

Chavez' chief liaison with Hizbullah appears to be Tarek El Aissami, Venezuela's Minister of Interior and Justice (pictured). The son of a Ba'ath Party official and great nephew of one of Saddam Hussein's associates, El Aissami was behind the passport production, according to the Miami Herald, as well as illegal raids on Jewish institutions in Venezuela.

The Iranian investment in Venezuela is estimated to be more than $2 billion. For Iran's Ahmadinejad it's a solid investment in undermining American interests in America's own backyard.

Iran and Hizbullah can also count on the lawless "TBA" -- the tri-border area where Argentina, Brazil and Paraguay meet -- for logistical support. The bombers who blew up the Israeli Embassy in Buenos Aires in 1992 and the Argentinian Jewish Association Building in 1994 are believed to have come out of the TBA under Iranian direction. Senior Iranian diplomats and officials, including former president Rafsanjani, have been formally charged by Argentinian prosecutors for ordering the bombings.

U.S. Southern Commander, Admiral James Stavridis, told a House Armed Services Committee hearing in March 2008 that while the emergence of Islamic radical terrorist groups is a “less immediate force in the region ... it has the potential to become of greater concern to us. At the moment, I would say, at an unclassified level, [their efforts are] largely centered in proselytizing, recruiting, money laundering. It is hooked somewhat into the narcotics trade and, above all, it is a means of generation of revenue, largely for the Hizbullah Islamic radical organization. Monies are garnered here in Latin America and go back to Hizbullah,” said Stavridis.

The admiral also said the Southern Command is “concerned about linkage between the Iranian state and nascent Islamic radical terrorism in this region.”

And Don't Forget Russia

Iran’s challenge to the United States parallels Russia’s efforts to “reinforce multipolarity in the world,” explained recently in Le Monde as a policy to “sustain and develop poles of resistance to U.S. hegemony and unilateralism.” Russia recently announced the reestablishment of a Russian naval base in Tarsus, Syria. Russian and Venezuelan ships conducted military exercises in the Caribbean last week, and a Russian destroyer, the Admiral Chabanenko, traversed the Panama Canal over the weekend – the first time a Russian warship crossed the canal since World War II. Approximately two-thirds of American oil imports travel along four sea routes through the Caribbean to Gulf Coast ports.

Map: http://www.weltrekordreise.ch/flags-maps/mideast_map.jpg

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, December 9, 2008

"Palestinians Overjoyed at Making It to the Holy Land"

That's the headline in the Arab News today (December 9) published in Saudi Arabia.

"The Holy Land" doesn't refer to Palestinian Arabs exercising their "right of return" to Palestine, or to Israel or even to al Quds (Jerusalem). The headline refers to Palestinians making their pilgrimage, their Haj, to their holy land in Mecca, Saudi Arabia for the Eid Al-Adha holiday.

Mecca and Medina are the holiest sites to Sunni Muslims. The al-Aqsa mosque in Jerusalem is considered their third holy site. While Shiite Muslims also revere Mecca and Medina, their next holiest sites are the mosques/tombs of the 12 Shiite imams in places like Najaf and Karbala in Iraq and Qom in Iran.

According to Palestinian Authority Chairman Mahmoud Abbas, Israel Never Prevented Palestinians from Making the Haj Pilgrimage Like Hamas Does. The Jerusalem Post reported, "PA leader Mahmoud Abbas accused Hamas of preventing thousands of Palestinians from making the annual Haj pilgrimage to Mecca, Israel Radio reported Saturday. Abbas told reporters in Mecca that Israel had never once prevented Palestinians from making the holy visit. Palestinians wishing to travel to Saudi Arabia through Egypt were not given permits."

Sphere: Related Content