Wednesday, April 23, 2008

What’s Really behind the Screaming Headlines about the Arrest of an Octogenarian Spy for Israel?

American engineer Ben-Ami Kadish was arrested on Tuesday for allegedly providing to an Israeli “handler” classified data on nuclear weapons, F-15 fighter jets, and the Patriot missile air defense system.

A few important points of perspective are vital: Kadish is 84 years old. The alleged crime took place some 25-30 years ago (!), between 1979 and 1985. Today Mr. Kadish lives an open, active life in a New Jersey retirement village where, according to a community newspaper, he and his wife open their sukka every year to raise money for local charities and for Magen David Adom.
According to the New Jersey Jewish News, “Ben-Ami grew up in what was then Palestine and fought with the Hagana. He also served in both the British and American military during World War II and is an ex-commander of the Jewish War Veterans Post 609 in Monroe.”

News accounts suggest that Kadish’s handler was the same man who directed Jonathan Pollard. Probably to avoid any issue of statute-of-limitations, the indictment alleges that this Zayde maintained ties to his handler until last month.


Why now?

Do federal prosecutors really see octogenarian Kadish as a major criminal? More likely, Kadish is being used by American officials as a means to loosen support for Israel as the two countries enter a tenacious period of negotiations. This is a pattern of American pressure that repeats itself. The tactic is geared to embarrass American supporters of Israel, particularly Members of Congress, who oppose weapons sales to Israel’s foes, dangerous concessions to the Palestinians, or the abrogation of previous commitments to Israel.

During the last 30 years, particularly, in times of tension, American officials claimed that Israel stole plans for the Sidewinder air-to-air missiles, diverted nuclear material from a U.S. plant in the 1960s, illegally obtained krytron triggers for nuclear weapons, pilfered computer components from Patriot missiles, and used American technology on the Lavie aircraft that was later transferred to China. The 2005 arrest of two AIPAC staffers is more of the same, and they were charged under the creaky 1917 Espionage Act statute older than Kadish. For years, unnamed American spy-hunters have been looking for an accomplice to Jonathan Pollard. Leaks on these stories almost always took place on the eve of some contretemps with the U.S. State Department.

Today’s case against 84-year-old Kadish reflects more the impatience of the U.S. Secretary of State with Israel’s decision to continue building in Jerusalem and in settlement blocs and to retain security roadblocks. To push ahead in the illusionary Annapolis process at all costs, the State Department must de-emphasize President Bush’s letter to Prime Minister Sharon stating that it is “unrealistic” to seek a “full and complete return to the armistice lines of 1949.” With President George Bush on his way to Israel to celebrate Israel’s 60th anniversary, what better way to deflate the goodwill and cut-down the gifts the President is supposedly bringing?

Lastly, in the twilight of George Bush’s administration, a presidential pardon for Jonathan Pollard is again being discussed, at least by Jewish and Israeli sources. Disclosure of another Pollard-like spy would be an effective tool to keep Pollard locked up for good.

Sphere: Related Content

Thursday, April 10, 2008

The Iran-Gaza Axis Is Not New

Iran attempted to establish a beachhead in Gaza much before Hamas and Ahmadinejad.

A new study published today shows that Hamas “is engaged in the broadest and most significant military buildup in its history with help from Syria and Iran,” in the words of the New York Times.

Kudos to the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center for their new study, Hamas’ Military Buildup in the Gaza Strip.

But analysts err when they focus only on Hamas; Iran deserves the main spotlight. Iran sees itself as a growing regional superpower. As the American military learned in Iraq, Iran will use whatever proxy is available in order to attack Western interests in the region. In the case of the Palestinians, the Islamic Republic worked closely with Yasser Arafat for decades, particularly after the Oslo agreements granted Arafat a foothold in the Palestinian territories. Arafat’s relationship with Ayatollah Khomeini predates the 1979 Iranian revolution.

Former CIA senior officer Robert Baer details the Iranian-Palestinian relationship in See No Evil, The True Story of a Ground Soldier in the CIA’s War on Terrorism. “Arafat had put his entire worldwide terrorist network at Iran’s disposal,” Baer pointed out. “Having been forced out of Beirut in 1982 by the Israelis, he had handed it over lock, stock, and barrel to the Iranians for safekeeping.”

The liaison between Arafat and Iran was none other than master terrorist Imad Mughniyeh, a former member of Arafat’s Force 17, the mastermind of anti-American bombings in Lebanon, the man behind the bombings of Israeli and Jewish institutions in Argentina, and the alleged chief planner for the Hizbullah war against Israel.

Once Arafat established his beachhead in Gaza, Mughniyeh set about to arm it with Iranian weapons – seven years ago.

Click here to look at the inventory of the Santorini and Karine-A ships captured by Israel in 2001 and 2002, respectively. It includes the same weaponry smuggled into Gaza over the last year and now being used against Israeli civilians. Pay particular attention to the Grad 122 mm rockets and the 120 mm mortars. Those were fired against Ashkelon last month. And don’t ignore the shoulder-fired anti-aircraft missiles and the anti-tank Saggers which are presumably now in the Palestinian arsenal and will be used sooner, rather than later.

Israel’s vigilance in 2001 and 2002 blocked the delivery of the weapons to Arafat’s forces. The surrender of the Philadelphi route between Sinai and Gaza two years ago opened the gates above and below ground for the weapons to flood in.

Sphere: Related Content

Tuesday, April 8, 2008

On Cue: UNHCR Settles Palestinian Refugees ... in Chile

Sunday's blog posting on the failure to resolve the Palestinian refugee problem compares the UN Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA)'s abysmal performance to that of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR).

As if on cue, the UNHCR resettled the first contingent of 117 Palestinian refugees in Chile this week. As explained in this AP report, "The refugees had spent months stranded at a desert camp on the Iraqi-Syrian border. They were the first of 117 Palestinians whom the Chilean government has agreed to receive under a plan coordinated with the Catholic Church and the Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees. The refugees will live in La Calera, a city northwest of the capital, Santiago, that has a strong Arabic community."

In other words, these Palestinians never fell under UNRWA's corrupted and corrupting care. They were refugees from the Iraq war, not from the Arab-Israeli wars of 1948 and 1967. As a result, they are not being forced into the anti-Israel UNRWA stage production that keeps refugees in their poverty-ridden state of suspended animation.

Thousands of Palestinians have fled Baghdad in recent years. As explained by the UNHCR, "Under the Saddam Hussein regime in Iraq, the [Palestinians] received protection and assistance and enjoyed a relatively high standard of treatment that some segments of the Iraqi population considered unfair. Soon after the U.S.-led invasion of Iraq in 2003, the Palestinians were targeted with forced eviction, death threats and killings in Baghdad. Many sought refuge in neighboring Jordan and Syria but became stranded in desolate border camps."

In September 2007, Brazil accepted some 100 Palestinians who were stranded for over four years in Jordan's Ruweished camp.

Sphere: Related Content

Sunday, April 6, 2008

Looking for a Solution to the Palestinian Refugee Problem?
Close UNRWA

The UN Agency does more to perpetuate refugees’ status than any other factor

The cramped house in the teeming Palestinian refugee camp of Daheisha is a hot piece of property. The 60-year-old structure inside Bethlehem is actually worth more than the houses 200 yards away outside of the camp. The house’s occupants are not even refugees from the 1948 war or the children or grandchildren of refugees. What makes the property so valuable, deep in the crowded warren, is the fact that the 12,804 residents of the semi-autonomous Daheisha camp pay no taxes to the Palestinian Authority.
They, like millions of Palestinians, including the children, grandchildren, and even great-grandchildren of 1948 refugees, are the wards of the United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) and the recipients of free food, health care and schooling. No group of refugees in the world was ever granted the largess the Palestinians receive and for so many decades and generations.

One of the most intractable issues in the Arab-Israeli conflict is the Palestinians’ claim to a “right of return” to homes and properties inside the 1949-1967 boundaries of Israel. 1,327,772 registered Palestinian refugees live in refugee camps in the West Bank, Gaza, Lebanon, Syria and Jordan, according to UNRWA’s annual report. They are a fraction of the purported 4.5 million UNRWA-registered refugees.

For almost 60 years world leaders have grown so accustomed to Palestinians living in refugee camps that they fail to ask two obvious questions: Why are millions of other refugees from historical conflicts like the Indian-Pakistan wars or the more recent Iraq war resettled rather than left to fester in refugee camps? And why in the world are there Palestinian refugee camps inside Palestinian-controlled areas such as Gaza and towns on the West Bank?

Cynics say that the Palestinian refugee camps remain as a perpetual demographic and propaganda tool against Israel. Palestinians are taught in schools and in their media that they will return one day to their purported properties in Haifa, Jaffa and Ashkelon. The mega-cynics claim that the UNRWA structure, with its $500 million annual budget (and hundreds of millions more in “emergency programs” -- $600 million in pledges between 2000 and 2006) and 24,324 employees (teachers, health service, administrative and support staff), is dedicated first and foremost to its own existence and perpetuation.

At what point will the UN appoint and fund an UNRWA office for the commemoration of UNRWA’s centennial?

By comparison, the parallel organization, the UN High Commissioner for Refugees handles millions of refugees at the annual cost of $1.3 billion. One of the UNHCR’s primary goals is resettlement, not the perpetuation of refugee status. “Following World War II, hundreds of thousands of Hungarian, Chilean, Ugandan, Vietnamese and Bosnian refugees have been resettled in a succession of large operations” UNHCR reports. “The ability to resettle refugees in need remains an effective way of offering refugees both protection and a lasting solution to their dilemma… In more than 50 years the UN High Commission for Refugees UNHCR has helped an estimated 50 million people restart their lives. Today, a staff of around 6,289 people in 111 countries continues to help 32.9 million persons.”

UNHCR estimates that 4 million Iraqis were displaced by the Iraq war. More than one million are in Syria; an estimated 750,000 are in Jordan. But, unlike UNRWA, no mechanism is being considered to perpetuate the Iraqi refugee problem – not for a year from now and certainly not for 60 years.

If the UNRWA monopoly were broken, the resettling of Palestinians living in West Bank and Gaza camps could be done immediately on land controlled by the Palestinian Authority – the land called “Area A.” It does not require the formal establishment of a Palestinian state. Large tracts can be purchased from Arab landowners for the construction of major housing projects. Thousands of Palestinian workers can be employed, especially those who used to work in Israel before borders were closed to keep suicide bombers out.

Employing local workers in construction in one small U.S. AID project two years ago provided a major boom to one Gaza neighborhood. Some two million dollars in home improvement loans were provided to 380 families, improving the lives of 1,900 Palestinians, and generating 56,076 person-days of employment, according to the U.S. agency.

By the way, newspaper accounts frequently refer to Gaza as one of the densest populated areas of the world (4,818 residents per square kilometer). Check the stats for Hong Kong (6407 residents per sq. km.) and Singapore (6369). Their population densities are greater than Gaza, but neither country is on the international dole. And if comparing figures, thanks to UNRWA’s health benefits, the Palestinians are among the healthiest and most literate in the Arab world. According to the CIA’s Factbook, life expectancy in Gaza and the West Bank stands at 73 years; in Egypt and Morocco 71 years; in Yemen 62 years. The Palestinians owe UNRWA for their 92 percent literacy. In Egypt literacy stands at 71 percent, Morocco 52 percent, and Yemen 50 percent.

Once Palestinian families can be moved out of the refugee camps into new homes, the ramshackle housing in the Palestinian territories can be razed, making available more land for Palestinian refugees from other countries who may want to resettle in the event that a Palestinian state is formed.

Billions of dollars for the Palestinian Authority were raised by the countries who met in Annapolis in November 2007. What better way to spend that money than putting Palestinians to work building their own housing in their own towns.

Sphere: Related Content